If Architecture Could Speak at Yale |
| By John Ritchie and James Bascom |
| May 17, 2010 |
Data Without Wisdom
![]() |
However, the architectural harmony on campus is shattered by the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Upon entering, one immediately perceives the absence of almost all natural light. The windowless main part of the library denies visitors that most basic natural element: sunlight. It gives the impression of being a lifeless mausoleum, a computerized warehouse for robots rather than an Ivy League library for humans.
Its giant honeycomb shaped walls of faintly-translucent granite placed within gray stone frames, together with the square waffle-pattern ceiling, make the library resemble the inside of a computer chip. The minimalist, square, metallic structure containing books offer the only clue that it is indeed a library. There are few chairs and no tables in sight. Where does one study here?
Just as the modern world tends to transform men into anonymous egalitarian “masses,” stripped of individual personality, so does this library seem to detach knowledge from the proper ambit of the human intellect. The building and the bookcases could just as easily be used to store computer servers, not precious tomes. It is, in effect, a display of relativistic egalitarian architecture, where each book is no greater or lesser than any other.
A library should reflect the wisdom and truth contained in its books. The Beinecke Library, however, reflects neither. The spirit of dehumanized egalitarianism in its architecture relegates the books to the level of mere “data” without beauty or wisdom. As a recent author put it, it is as “ugly as sin.”
Now let us turn to another library at Yale.
Where Noble Thoughts Soar
![]() |
![]() |
| The vivid clash of two cultures at Yale University. |
Would the harmony of this beautiful library survive if flashy computers were installed? Would a college student hooked on our cyber pop-culture, wearing ripped jeans, flip-flops and body piercing feel comfortable in this dignified atmosphere? Probably not.
Yet libraries like these formed Churchills, not hippies. Yes, this library, unlike the cold, box-like architecture of the Beinecke Library, allows students to embark on new intellectual and spiritual discoveries. This library, steeped in tradition, fosters true progress – progress within the marvelous framework of order created by God.
What noble tradition.
Send us your comments here or post them below.





Comments
This article does in fact cover an important issue in declining morality because, with the rise of relativism, less people are agreeing on an objectively better beauty, which surely exists. It's all part of our declining ability to appreciate the beautiful and to abhor the ugly.
Given a choice I would avoid the gloomy, ersazt Gothic.
http://www.inhabitat.com/amazing-green-roof-art-school-in-singapore/
http://www.inhabitat.com/amazing-green-roof-art-school-in-singapore/
As for the gothic library, yes it is beautiful and very reminiscent of medievel European churches. This was intentional, as it was to be a Cathedral to Knowledge, reflecting the Enlightment idea of we're-so-smart-we-don't-need-God. So, in this case though the architecture is indeed beautiful the design is less than edifying.
Please stick to simple, verifiable, non-abstract faith-based Truths, as this is your mission and strength.
Architectural analysis is really far too complex to approach with what amounts to your conventionalized, classical, opinionated assessment of these two buildings. Going further and metaphysically judging architecture (relative to your aesthetic preferences) is simply an absurd activity in a world of far more relevant and definitive spiritual problems.
Do I like the new building? Eh.. no. It's trying too hard... judging from the sparse photos you have provided.
Do not however make the mistake of ascribing holiness and right mindedness to those who superficially share your view of the world - while prejudging others (weirdos) as evil. That practice is older than the Salem witch trials.
The Beinecke Library does look dark & nontraditional. Yes-where's the light? the tables & chairs? This I take it as Yale starting its attempt to visually & environmentally shaping young minds to Yales Future Agenda.
As bright as some people are, don't even know they are being influenced in a different direction. Common knowledge of change without rebellion is to start slow.
Thank you for posting what's happening at campus.
Note from the editor:
Lindsay: Thank you for your comment. There's nothing wrong with sandals per se. However, ripped jeans, body piercing and outlandish tattoos often jive with flip flops. The important question here is "where is our culture heading?" Are customs, and fashion in particular, uplifting or degrading, beautiful or ugly? And in that context, is the widespread use of flip flops, for example, contributing to uplift society? It is fairly troubling when people attend formal events, or go to Church, sporting fashions that fail to respect that which is worthy of it.
Still, if sunlight is the problem, you should take a look at one of Yale's newest builidings: The Malone Science Center, where 90% of offices and workspaces not only have plenty of natural light but also have direct views to the outdoors.
Yale may have made some architectural mistakes. However, if you are going to criticize them, do a little research first.
Also, the picture of the library "where noble thoughts soar" looks pretty dark to me.