Home > Resources > Restoring Our Culture >

If Architecture Could Speak at Yale

By John Ritchie and James Bascom   
May 17, 2010

Data Without Wisdom

Beinecke Library at Yale
Most of the architecture at Yale University is strikingly similar to the hallowed halls of ancient European universities such as Oxford or Cambridge.  Much of its Gothic Revival or Georgian style buildings are simply awe-inspiring, providing an uplifting ambience for serious, scholarly study.

However, the architectural harmony on campus is shattered by the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library.  Upon entering, one immediately perceives the absence of almost all natural light. The windowless main part of the library denies visitors that most basic natural element: sunlight. It gives the impression of being a lifeless mausoleum, a computerized warehouse for robots rather than an Ivy League library for humans.

Its giant honeycomb shaped walls of faintly-translucent granite placed within gray stone frames, together with the square waffle-pattern ceiling, make the library resemble the inside of a computer chip.  The minimalist, square, metallic structure containing books offer the only clue that it is indeed a library. There are few chairs and no tables in sight.  Where does one study here?

Just as the modern world tends to transform men into anonymous egalitarian “masses,” stripped of individual personality, so does this library seem to detach knowledge from the proper ambit of the human intellect.  The building and the bookcases could just as easily be used to store computer servers, not precious tomes. It is, in effect, a display of relativistic egalitarian architecture, where each book is no greater or lesser than any other.

A library should reflect the wisdom and truth contained in its books. The Beinecke Library, however, reflects neither. The spirit of dehumanized egalitarianism in its architecture relegates the books to the level of mere “data” without beauty or wisdom.  As a recent author put it, it is as “ugly as sin.”

Now let us turn to another library at Yale.

Where Noble Thoughts Soar

Medical Library at Yale
This is the Medical Historical Library at Yale University. Look at its robust ship-like timbers, high open ceilings, and brass chandeliers. They form an ideal setting for calm reflection or serious study, where the most noble aspirations of the mind soar freely.

Beinecke   Library at Yale
The vivid clash of two
cultures at Yale University.
Notice the pleasant interplay of light and shadow that seem to pay homage to the distinguished intellects whose works are displayed here. The predominant woodwork creates a warm yet dignified atmosphere for study. Every minute detail, the fireplace, oil paintings, coat of arms, thick beams, leaded windows, tables and lamps please the eye and speak of tradition, unpretentious erudition and manly distinction.  One could easily picture Sir Winston Churchill seated at one of those polished wood tables preparing his next parliamentary speech. 

Would the harmony of this beautiful library survive if flashy computers were installed?  Would a college student hooked on our cyber pop-culture, wearing ripped jeans, flip-flops and body piercing feel comfortable in this dignified atmosphere? Probably not. 

Yet libraries like these formed Churchills, not hippies. Yes, this library, unlike the cold, box-like architecture of the Beinecke Library, allows students to embark on new intellectual and spiritual discoveries.  This library, steeped in tradition, fosters true progress – progress within the marvelous framework of order created by God.

What noble tradition.


Send us your comments here or post them below.
 

Comments 

 
0 #17 Thomas Nelson 2011-10-31 14:52
I think that people are forgetting just how important aesthetics are. Should we not strive to make the most beautiful looking structures? The structures in classical design are made in ways that perfectly imitate nature and the human form. So much more work has to be put into a classical building, which is the way it should be.

This article does in fact cover an important issue in declining morality because, with the rise of relativism, less people are agreeing on an objectively better beauty, which surely exists. It's all part of our declining ability to appreciate the beautiful and to abhor the ugly.
Quote
 
 
0 #16 Robert Dominick 2011-01-15 18:56
When I became upset at some political, religious, or moral outrage, a former employer would say to me, "Do you want to die on this particular hill?" That usually calmed me a bit. I ask you the same question. You are an organization that takes on some of the most important moral issues found on Catholic campuses today. Are you sure you want to start an argument about something as subjective as architectural style? How about sticking to orthodox theology and morality -- all of your supporters can vote for that. As for architecture, all you will get is a bunch of predictably differing opinions.
Quote
 
 
0 #15 Jane Hauger 2011-01-14 19:02
Please, don't judge the Bienecke from the picture posted here. I used Google images to find other and vastly more sympathetic photographs. It appears to be a magnificent structure with the glow through the marble reminiscent of cathedral glass. Seating areas are very thoughtfully arranged and are away from the stacks. The lighting is artistic.

Given a choice I would avoid the gloomy, ersazt Gothic.
Quote
 
 
+1 #14 Mary 2011-01-14 16:30
I appreciate this observation on architecture. Libraries are not warehouses. The Beinecke Library appears efficient and unimportant at the same time. The Medical History Library appears to invite one to sit down and think.
Quote
 
 
-4 #13 Mia Archer 2011-01-14 15:08
THE PROOF OF THE PUDDING IS IN THE EATING... BOTH LOOK GOOD TO ME. I AM AN AVID READER... AND HOLD 2 M.A. DEGREES AND A SPECIALIST DEGREE FROM UNIV. OF CALIF. IF I WERE THERE, I WOULD USE BOTH LIBRARIES, I AM SURE, DEPENDING ON AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS.
Quote
 
 
+1 #12 SueW 2011-01-14 14:16
John, This is a thought provoking article and hits home, especially with the older set (like me - I'm 66 years). I call it the difference between new technology and what I grew up with... New technology may be better and more efficient but old technology is "touchy and feel-y" and as I grow older, I feel I totally miss "touchy and feel-y" and wonder if I wouldn't rather use something touchy and feel-y even if it didn't offer the advantages of new technology. I think that's a dilemma many of us must face. And I don't know the answer but I sure enjoyed your article which told me, I'm not the only one missing the "touchy and feel-y" stuff. Thanks, SueW
Quote
 
 
-1 #11 Lion&Lamb 2011-01-14 14:10
Here is an example of a pleasing Art-architecture from one of the smallest nations on earth - Singapore. We can learn from them as they learn from elsewhere

http://www.inhabitat.com/amazing-green-roof-art-school-in-singapore/
Quote
 
 
-1 #10 Lion&Lamb 2011-01-14 14:07
This will speak for itself as an architecture design worth emulating. We can and should learn from other countries as well.

http://www.inhabitat.com/amazing-green-roof-art-school-in-singapore/
Quote
 
 
-1 #9 M. Myers 2011-01-14 14:02
I believe that in addition to avoiding direct sunlight, maintaining constant and appropriate temperature and humidity is important for the preservation of rare books and manuscripts. If indeed "form follows function" the Beinecke Library seems well designed for the purpose of appropriately caring for its valuable contents, as far as one can judge by one photograph. Sometimes other things are more important than ambiance.
Quote
 
 
+1 #8 Student 2011-01-14 12:38
It appears undeniable that the Beinecke library breaks with tradition and good taste. There are better ways to protect old and precious books from the harsh rays of the sun without making a structure that is an insult to man's intelligence and the architectural harmony of Yale's campus. Modern art is indeed modern perhaps, but is it really art? Sometimes I wonder.
Quote
 
 
0 #7 J.NormanSayles 2011-01-14 12:06
Bauhaus endures.
Quote
 
 
+3 #6 Maria Key 2011-01-14 11:29
I think this article is a bit off-base. For one thing, as J. Buonocore stated, the point of the marble on the walls is to allow light, but protect the rare books. Inside, I think it gives a lovely effect, like I imagine light filtered into the womb. Yale tour guides will tell you that the outside looks like a sheet of S&H green stamps because the Beinecke family (who paid for the library) owned that company. A myth, but easy to see how it came about.

As for the gothic library, yes it is beautiful and very reminiscent of medievel European churches. This was intentional, as it was to be a Cathedral to Knowledge, reflecting the Enlightment idea of we're-so-smart-we-don't-need-God. So, in this case though the architecture is indeed beautiful the design is less than edifying.
Quote
 
 
+1 #5 TJ 2011-01-14 11:16
Well I have to agree with the posted thus far. The library is dedicated to rare and precious books. Sunlight would damage them. However I will agree with the author that tables at least would be nice. But since I can only go by one picture as I did not attend Yale or have seen the full library who's not to say there is not a designated study somewhere in this place? The other library appears more comfortable to me and more of "study" atmosphere. Unless this author attended Yale I wonder why so much attention is brought to this? I think more of an intent to show the point of the cultural importance would have stimulated more constructive criticism.
Quote
 
 
-2 #4 Nathaniel MacBain 2011-01-14 10:59
I find it distressing that this website is offering architectural critique.

Please stick to simple, verifiable, non-abstract faith-based Truths, as this is your mission and strength.

Architectural analysis is really far too complex to approach with what amounts to your conventionalized, classical, opinionated assessment of these two buildings. Going further and metaphysically judging architecture (relative to your aesthetic preferences) is simply an absurd activity in a world of far more relevant and definitive spiritual problems.

Do I like the new building? Eh.. no. It's trying too hard... judging from the sparse photos you have provided.

Do not however make the mistake of ascribing holiness and right mindedness to those who superficially share your view of the world - while prejudging others (weirdos) as evil. That practice is older than the Salem witch trials.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 voelker 2011-01-14 10:58
Most libraries I have had the pleasure of visiting are beautifully balanced with Natural light. Architecture of bold & beautifully different styles to reflect distinction and ambiance of a higher kind of thinking.

The Beinecke Library does look dark & nontraditional. Yes-where's the light? the tables & chairs? This I take it as Yale starting its attempt to visually & environmentally shaping young minds to Yales Future Agenda.

As bright as some people are, don't even know they are being influenced in a different direction. Common knowledge of change without rebellion is to start slow.

Thank you for posting what's happening at campus.
Quote
 
 
+5 #2 Lindsay 2010-06-18 13:21
I've never disagreed with any article on this website until now. I agree it is a really ugly library, but to act like it is unholy is stretching it. Also, you have a problem with flip flops? Because Jesus wore sandals, and monks wear sandals, all Franciscans wear sandals...

Note from the editor:

Lindsay: Thank you for your comment. There's nothing wrong with sandals per se. However, ripped jeans, body piercing and outlandish tattoos often jive with flip flops. The important question here is "where is our culture heading?" Are customs, and fashion in particular, uplifting or degrading, beautiful or ugly? And in that context, is the widespread use of flip flops, for example, contributing to uplift society? It is fairly troubling when people attend formal events, or go to Church, sporting fashions that fail to respect that which is worthy of it.
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 J. Buonocore 2010-06-01 18:06
The purpose of the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library is right in the name: to house delicate, fragile "rare" books and manuscripts. A little research would yield that the architect chose to filter the light through stone in order to mitigate the damaging effects that direct sunlight would have on these precious books. The design of this library does "reflect wisdom and truth contained in its books" through a simple, protective building that beautifully explores the materiality of stone.

Still, if sunlight is the problem, you should take a look at one of Yale's newest builidings: The Malone Science Center, where 90% of offices and workspaces not only have plenty of natural light but also have direct views to the outdoors.

Yale may have made some architectural mistakes. However, if you are going to criticize them, do a little research first.

Also, the picture of the library "where noble thoughts soar" looks pretty dark to me.
Quote
 

Add comment

Comments will be approved by a moderator before appearing on the site. Any comments that contain inappropriate language or content will not be posted. Your email is required but will not be made public.


Security code
Refresh

Subscribe and learn how to defend moral values

Subscribe Now